ext_13445 ([identity profile] kateelliott.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] alfreda89 2011-03-22 09:51 pm (UTC)

I don't think the bill will pass, and it certainly has first amendment implications, but "bull in the field" doesn't quite characterize the intent or reasoning behind what is going on and why the bill was introduced.

It's not really a Nanny State bill in the sense I think most people would use that term.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting