In general, while I abhor frivolous lawsuits, I think it's a dangerous precedent to outlaw them. Like so many things, it's a slippery slope. You have to allow the stupid wrong things, so that you don't lose the ability to do the unusual, unexpected ... but surprisingly necessary things. Or the things that the big boys don't want you to do, but need to be done.
Now, ask me how I feel about "loser pays court costs" in a case deemed frivolous ...
Now, ask me how I feel about "loser pays court costs" in a case deemed frivolous ...
Dare I? As a person who was sued as a means to get to an insurance company, I was pretty shaking in my boots -- I was sued for more than I had policy insurance. But I won the case 10-2.
no subject
Now, ask me how I feel about "loser pays court costs" in a case deemed frivolous ...
no subject
Dare I? As a person who was sued as a means to get to an insurance company, I was pretty shaking in my boots -- I was sued for more than I had policy insurance. But I won the case 10-2.