UPDATE #2:
False alarm, I am glad to say. The suggestions from the Copyright Office are not as extreme as we all feared. That doesn't make them great, but it's not hysteria time. Just time to read and understand the proposals.
Can you say "copyright law changes are trigger-y?" Of course you can--and they are. Here for more.
UPDATE:
I trusted my source and hadn't gotten through the topic completely, and turns out we had incomplete information. Writer Sharon Lee (who is
rolanni) took down her other post, and has these links for your perusal. Marking so I can read them, too.
Pass on through for more...
False alarm, I am glad to say. The suggestions from the Copyright Office are not as extreme as we all feared. That doesn't make them great, but it's not hysteria time. Just time to read and understand the proposals.
Can you say "copyright law changes are trigger-y?" Of course you can--and they are. Here for more.
UPDATE:
I trusted my source and hadn't gotten through the topic completely, and turns out we had incomplete information. Writer Sharon Lee (who is
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Pass on through for more...